maintoro
Hinnoittelu
Arkkitehtuuri
Kirjaudu sisäänKirja demoAloita ilmaiseksi
maintoro

Moderni CMMS pysäyttämättömään käytettävyyteen. Työmääräykset, ennaltaehkäisevä huolto ja omaisuudenhallinta – yhdessä yksinkertaisessa sovelluksessa.

G2 4,8/5SOC 2GDPRISO 27001Rakennettu Virossa
Tuote
  • Työmääräykset
  • Ennaltaehkäisevä huolto
  • Omaisuuden seuranta
  • QR + NFC-tunnisteet
  • Mobiilisovellus
  • Työpyyntöportaali
  • Julkinen API
Ratkaisut
  • Valmistus
  • Kiinteistönhallinta
  • Ruoka ja juoma
  • Toimitilojen hallinta
  • Hotellit
  • Terveydenhuolto
  • Kaikki toimialat →
Vertaa
  • vs MaintainX
  • vs Limble
  • vs UpKeep
  • vs Fiix
  • vs eMaint
  • Siirtymäopas
Oppia
  • Blogi
  • Oppaat
  • Sanasto
  • Mallit
  • Laskimet
  • Webinaarit
  • Käyttöopas
  • Asiakkaiden tarinoita
Yritys
  • Noin
  • Ura
  • Paina
  • Varaa demo
  • Ota yhteyttä
  • Turvallisuus
  • Integraatiot
  • Yhteistyökumppanit
  • Status

© 2026 Maintoro OÜ · Tallinn, Estonia · hello@maintoro.com

YksityisyysEvästeetGDPREhdot
Kaikki tapaustutkimukset
Pharmaceutical·US East Coast

99.4% PM compliance + 0 FDA PAI maintenance findings

A 180,000-sqft sterile-fill pharmaceutical manufacturer migrated from paper-based PM tracking to Maintoro under formal validation protocol — and produced their first FDA PAI in 22 years with zero maintenance-related 483 observations.

0 FDA PAI maintenance findings (site record)
Sterile-injectable pharmaceutical · 180,000 sqft14 maintenance · 4 calibration · 6 quality · 2 IT validationValidated deployment over 16 weeks (URS / FRS / IQ / OQ / PQ)
99.0%–99.6% (4 quarters)
PM compliance
0 (site record)
FDA PAI maintenance findings
6–8wk → 11 days
Calibration deviation investigation
16 weeks site-wide
Validation total effort

The challenge

Paper PM logs failed cGMP scrutiny routinely; calibration cycles drifted from manufacturer specifications; deviation investigations took 6–8 weeks to close because retrospective batch-impact analysis was a manual paper exercise. The site had received maintenance-related 483 observations on every FDA inspection in its 22-year history.

What they implemented

A 16-week validated deployment under formal change control:

  • URS / FRS authoring with cross-functional Quality and IT validation team
  • 21 CFR Part 11 design-time controls activated (electronic signatures, audit trails, NIST-traceable timestamps)
  • IQ / OQ / PQ execution with documented test scripts and Quality release for production use
  • Calibration workflow with retrospective batch-impact assessment automated for all critical instruments

How results were measured

PM compliance tracked daily across all manufacturing-relevant assets. FDA PAI inspection results compared against site's 22-year history of inspection outcomes. Calibration deviation investigation duration measured from initial out-of-tolerance reading to Quality release of investigation report.

“We held 99.4% PM compliance for 4 quarters and our last FDA PAI closed with zero maintenance-related 483 observations — first time in the site's 22-year history. The Part 11 controls held up to inspector scrutiny because they were designed in, not bolted on.”

Quality Director · sterile-fill pharmaceutical manufacturer

cGMP-ready maintenance under 21 CFR Part 11

Electronic signatures, audit trails, and validation packages built into the platform from day one.

Aloita ilmaiseksi