maintoro
Precios
Arquitectura
AccesoReservar demostraciónEmpieza gratis
maintoro

CMMS moderno para un tiempo de actividad imparable. Órdenes de trabajo, mantenimiento preventivo y gestión de activos, en una aplicación sencilla.

G2 4.8/5SOC 2GDPRISO 27001Construido en Estonia
Producto
  • Órdenes de trabajo
  • Mantenimiento preventivo
  • Seguimiento de activos
  • Etiquetas QR + NFC
  • Aplicación móvil
  • Portal de solicitud de trabajo
  • API pública
Soluciones
  • Fabricación
  • Gestión de propiedades
  • Alimentos y bebidas
  • Gestión de instalaciones
  • Hoteles
  • Cuidado de la salud
  • Todas las industrias →
Comparar
  • vs MantenerX
  • vs Limble
  • frente a mantener
  • contra Fiix
  • frente a eMaint
  • Guía de migración
Aprender
  • Blog
  • Guías
  • Glosario
  • Plantillas
  • Calculadoras
  • Seminarios web
  • Guía del usuario
  • Historias de clientes
Compañía
  • Acerca de
  • Carreras
  • Prensa
  • Reserva una demostración
  • Contacto
  • Seguridad
  • Integraciones
  • Fogonadura
  • Estado

© 2026 Maintoro OÜ · Tallinn, Estonia · hello@maintoro.com

PrivacidadGalletasGDPRTérminos
Todos los estudios de caso
Pharmaceutical·US East Coast

99.4% PM compliance + 0 FDA PAI maintenance findings

A 180,000-sqft sterile-fill pharmaceutical manufacturer migrated from paper-based PM tracking to Maintoro under formal validation protocol — and produced their first FDA PAI in 22 years with zero maintenance-related 483 observations.

0 FDA PAI maintenance findings (site record)
Sterile-injectable pharmaceutical · 180,000 sqft14 maintenance · 4 calibration · 6 quality · 2 IT validationValidated deployment over 16 weeks (URS / FRS / IQ / OQ / PQ)
99.0%–99.6% (4 quarters)
PM compliance
0 (site record)
FDA PAI maintenance findings
6–8wk → 11 days
Calibration deviation investigation
16 weeks site-wide
Validation total effort

The challenge

Paper PM logs failed cGMP scrutiny routinely; calibration cycles drifted from manufacturer specifications; deviation investigations took 6–8 weeks to close because retrospective batch-impact analysis was a manual paper exercise. The site had received maintenance-related 483 observations on every FDA inspection in its 22-year history.

What they implemented

A 16-week validated deployment under formal change control:

  • URS / FRS authoring with cross-functional Quality and IT validation team
  • 21 CFR Part 11 design-time controls activated (electronic signatures, audit trails, NIST-traceable timestamps)
  • IQ / OQ / PQ execution with documented test scripts and Quality release for production use
  • Calibration workflow with retrospective batch-impact assessment automated for all critical instruments

How results were measured

PM compliance tracked daily across all manufacturing-relevant assets. FDA PAI inspection results compared against site's 22-year history of inspection outcomes. Calibration deviation investigation duration measured from initial out-of-tolerance reading to Quality release of investigation report.

“We held 99.4% PM compliance for 4 quarters and our last FDA PAI closed with zero maintenance-related 483 observations — first time in the site's 22-year history. The Part 11 controls held up to inspector scrutiny because they were designed in, not bolted on.”

Quality Director · sterile-fill pharmaceutical manufacturer

cGMP-ready maintenance under 21 CFR Part 11

Electronic signatures, audit trails, and validation packages built into the platform from day one.

Empieza gratis